Monday, January 21, 2013

BOOK REVIEW: The Erap Tragedy

It is an opportune time to revisit the lessons of EDSA 2 given the aggressive stance of former president Estrada's to revive his political career by running for the mayoral race of Manila City in May 2013 elections. The Laquian's account of their first hand experience with the Estrada administration captures the reasons behind the fall of the ill-fated president. In less than 2 years, Estrada squandered the people's trust. Just like Marcos, he spent his time amassing wealth and strengthening his relations with his multiple families and cronies. EDSA 2, although later discredited by former Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo's numerous scandals, salvaged the country from the pits of demoralization.

The 10-chapter volume is a chronicle of the short-lived service of the Laquians as advisers to the president. Aprodicio Laquian served as the chief of staff but was unduly relieved from office due to what he considered as "irresponsible statements". He apologized for the following remarks he made during the Manila Overseas Press Club on March 2000.[1]

  • ''Now, another responsibility that I am supposed to have is to help the President's time management. That, to me, is almost mission impossible because the President is used to be the superstar. He is the only superstar in the Palace. In fact one time I told him: Mr. President may naghihintay. He told me: the President is always on time, the guests are early. So ano magagawa mo . . . we try to organize this day, and this night and this morning and so on. Whether he's . . . sleepy because he was with other friends . . ."
  • ''Some people are wondering: You know, Rod Laquian and his wife are entitled to socialized housing. Why are they staying in Arlegui? I tell you, so that we can be available to the President 24 hours a day, seven days a week. It's not unusual to get a phone call from the Palace at two in the morning and he says '. . . kailangan ito dito' and you go." 
  • "It is not unusual to be in the Ang Pangulo, the presidential yacht, and you know feeling so good you know may sarili kaming kuwarto doon sa aming pagtulog but three o'clock in the morning kumanta ka daw ''Maalaala Mo Kaya.'' 
  • ''It's the best thing...at four o'clock in the morning I'm the only sober person. . .and if this is in Canada I will be the designated driver. I will be the one taking them to their beds and so on. So, at least if there is the one person who is sober in the room who would be able to take all of these things that were signed and then hide them in my record book, then the decision-making will probably be -- in the beautiful light of the morning --- be very rational.''
Prod clarified that he never saw  the president drunk and he sincerely delivered his public apology and tendered his "irrevocable resignation". This act confirmed the man's commitment to integrity and delicadeza. He unintentionally (but factually) sullied the name of the president. Estrada found it easy to ease him out from office mainly because he was just a "spare tire", a  product of political accommodation. The Laquians were personally recommended by Dr. Raul De Guzman, Erap's brother-in-law and his presidential adviser on development and administration, to help the office of the president. Prod, however, was given an office (chief of staff) which overlaps with the functions of the Executive Secretary (Ronaldo Zamora) and the Presidential Management Staff (Lenny de Jesus)

The first two chapters highlight the rise to power of the charismatic president (Champion of the Poor and The People's Court). The Estrada administration became so overconfident due to massive popular support.  It overestimated the people's willingness to support unpopular policies. Erap failed that much because he presented himself as a leader who can deliver that much. Filipinos got frustrated over his explicit promises ("walang kama-kamag-anak, walang kaibi-kaibigan")  not to be corrupt. Lo and behold, the promising inaugural speech turned out to be a movie script. The people believed the president but he violated their trust big time.

The Role of Political Culture
The authors' academic character makes it essential to have a clear grasp of the political culture of the country and how it impinges on the leadership predilections of Erap. The fall of his administration should be situated within the large political and cultural context of the country. Politicians in the country exhibit fatalistic tendencies, always desire to save "face" and would give primacy to the interests of their families, clans and factions. The wide gap between  the rich and the poor resulted in the weak implementation of the rule of law, double standard of justice and the strong military role in the country's political life. The country's political culture augur well for the rise of leaders like Estrada.

There is a need to distinguish the ideal politics (no-nonsense leadership) from the elitist, hard-boiled model which Erap embraced. The president is categorized as a positive-passive leader who is compliant and easily manipulated due to strong need to be loved and admired. The tremendous powers and prerogative of the presidency were not widely used by Erap which resulted in disarrayed government programs. Spin doctors were hired to establish his reputation and deodorize the negative news hurled against his office. He heeded to the whispered counsel (bulong) of his cronies who, in one way or another, impinged on his policies.

The authors attributed to the troika of "Ms" the downfall of the regime: money, mistresses and mansions. The role of the watchdog media helped exposed the veiled luxurious lifestyle of the president. Laquians consider this incongruent to the pro-poor rhetoric of the Estrada presidency. They witnessed the opulent lifestyle of the president from the use of his official yacht, Ang Pangulo, to the decoration of his Malacanang residence.

Psychological Underpinnings (from San Juan to Malacanang)
Chapter 4 presents an in-depth look at the pyschological rationale of the president's leadership style, which can be gleaned from his rebellious childhood, lavish stardom and political stint from being San Juan Mayor up to his entry to Malacanang. The young Estrada found it difficult to compete against his elder brothers, Paula and Emilio, and his elder sisters, Pilarica and Patrocinio. Erap's brothers were all handsome and fair-skinned mestizons while the ladies were very religious, well-behaved and got good academic grades. An interview with the president's close relatives and friends revealed that he identified himself with the "masa" because of his failure to get close to his immediate family. Erap found his identity and sense of self in the company of poor boys from a slum area in San Juan. His exposure to gang wars and urban poor rumble made him as a "toughie".

Erap was considered by his parents as the "black sheep" of the clan due to several brawls he got involved into (including his fight with an American student at the Ateneo boys toilet). His insecurities led him to enter the showbiz industry for fame and fortune. His mother prohibited him from using the Ejercito family name for fear of another disgrace. Hence, the screen name "Joseph Estrada" was popularized--the man who lived a lifestyle that involved heavy drinking, gambling and womanizing. This observation is complemented by interesting trivias offered by the authors. The president had an insatiable fetish for coats and jackets. He did not mind spending a lot of money for one he fancied. Erap's signature wristband covers a scar from samurai wound he got in a movie sword fight. When former president Marcos asked him what support he would like to have for the people of San Juan City (as a political gratis), Erap requested for a parcel of land in Taytay where he relocated many San Juan squatter residents. For some psychologists, Erap was considered bright and has a phenomenal ability to remember names, backgrounds and specific events. He, however, has a low capacity to analyze problem in an "objective, systematic and rational manner" (pp. 107).

The President and the Snake Pit
Chapters 5 and 6 detonate the political bombshells. They present the complex and never-before-seen character of the "snake pit", that is, Malacanang. It is not unusual for Prod to have at most 4 hours sleep due to the demands of his job---from reading daily newspapers to fixing the president's schedule. He likewise witnessed the jarring view of how Erap treated his subordinates in a domineering and bullying way. This trained Erap's secretaries to be "ultra-sensitive" to his moods. He is known to "baptize" people with crude and hurting names (i.e. Kalbo for baldy, Pandak for short one and BIR (Babaeng Inurungan ng Regla for old maids). One major liability was Erap's aggressive decision-making. His ego and pride took control of him. He stopped listening to his well-meaning advisers who truly desired him to pursue good governance.

Prod once said that living in a "snake pit" would make him as a "snake charmer." His efforts to get the house in order failed when he clashed with the PMS chief, Lenny de Jesus, also called as the Dragon (Crying) Lady of the palace. At many times, he was not comfortable with the micro-management practices (completed staff work) of Leny--from determining who will ride the presidential plane up to making scripts for cabinet meetings. The President acted as a mere "talking head" in these sessions. Several controversies were hurled against the Laquian couple including the accusation that they were trying to establish their sub-kingdom in the palace that could undermine the job of Rod Reyes, the Press Secretary and  the PMS chief.

Estrada may have possessed the patriotism and nationalism that the Filipino people needed during the turbulent years of the country's history. Nonetheless, his political experience as a city mayor, senator and Vice-President never provided him enough technical know-how to lead the country (pp. 102-103). He is known to despise long speeches and meetings. He gets easily bored with details of a plan. He rarely participated in serious intellectual discussion. Erap behaved and spoke like your normal urban poor guy with his "green jokes" and under the belt, sexist remarks. He lacked the internal moral compass to be a national symbol of good values. His inability to control his appetites proved to be a liability. Erap was a self-indulging man who loved to eat high-cholesterol foods (i.e. lechon and pochero). He had poor work habits and manifested aversion to long hour is focused, serious work. His sexual appetite was legendary as attested by his numerous mistresses and dozen children. The authors mentioned in one instance, how Loi Ejercito remained calm and civil despite the abusive remarks of her husband. They praised Loi for her temperance for being the "emotional punching bag" of the president.

The President never had a coherent program of governance for the first 100 days. Much of time were spent appointing people to more than 6,000 positions in the government and renovation of infrastructures to be used by the chief executive.  The president had "only the vaguest notion of what he wanted to do." (pp. 137). He hired more than 30 presidential assistants with full-time salaries, more than 20 consultants and many informal "calling card" presidential assistants. All of them were appointed due to political backers who helped Estrada win the 1998 elections.

Estrada was notorious for being tardy in gracing important meetings. His mood swings got the better of him. Hence, his cabinet secretaries were always on their toes for any last minute changes in his itinerary (i.e. deliver the speech of president). Malacanang would always argue that the "president was never late, the people were early." He was not given enough honeymoon period by the media. From day one, he was lambasted by the press. Consequently, Erap retaliated by commanding his friends to withdraw their advertisements from broadsheets which magnified his political incompetence (i.e. Philippine Daily Inquirer, Manila Times). The move by the Office of Executive Secretary to amend the ways of the "undisciplined" leader came too late and was overtaken by  the actions of a critical mass of people who desired Estrada to vacate Malacanang.

Overall, the president's leadership style can be summarized as follows (pp. 168-169): 1) He lacked an overall direction in his administration; 2) He disdained the day-to-day tasks of running a government; 3) He was not a consultative decision-maker; 4) He made decisions with incomplete information, he often made mistakes; 5) Erap mixed official and personal affairs in his public decision-making; and 5) He failed to use the considerable professional and technical resources in PMS, the Office of the Executive Secretary and other units inside Malacanang to assist him.

Estrada never fully understood his role as the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. He found it difficult to identify with the diciplined and polished character of the military. Erap was not fond of the military and the "generals did not like him" (pp. 212). The personal decision-making of the president did not augur well to the objective, institutional rules of the institution. This could be a reason why General Angelo Reyes, then AFP Chief of Staff, easily declared, during EDSA 2, his withdrawal of support to the president, justifying his action as mere compliance to Article 2, section 3 of the Constitution, which states that the military should protect the state and its people.

The "Barkada" Factor
Before leaving for Canada, Prod had a last word for the president: "Bayad na po kayo" referring to his constant admonition to the president to stop giving favors to his cronies and sycophants (sipsip). During the president's inaugural address, the couple was requested by Erap's brother and mother to help the president keep away from the bad influence of his political and business peers. But for the Laquians, it was next to impossible to carry out the task mainly because of Estrada's sensitivity and volatile temperament whenever people talk ill of his friends. In a country where political leaders protect their family's interest, Erap was an exponential and classic example since he has more than one family.

Several political actors competed for the ears of the president. Basically, he nurtured five groups--his bosom buddies (i.e. FPJ, Reli German and Ducky Paredes), Chinoy business cronies (i.e. Atong Ang, Lucio Tan, Mark Jimenez), political and religious allies (i.e. Maceda, Angara, Velarde of El Shaddai), technocrats of his administration (i.e. Pardo of DTI, Diokno and Medalla of UP School of Economics) and family members. Due to divergent interests, political clashes are normal among the president's men, especially between Ronaldo Zamora (Executive Secretary) and Robert Aventajado, Erap's kumpadre and mobilizer for JEEP, the president's link to civil society organizations.  The term "midnight cabinet" was coined, which later surfaced in the media because of the stubborn habit of president's allies and close friends to visit Malacanang at the wee hours of the night. Of all the groups, it was the technocrat circle which truly desired to help the president in his pro-poor programs.

Of Poverty and Civil Society
Chapter 8 provides a good scan of poverty studies in  the country (pp. 229-240). The poor in urban centers and the countryside comprised the bulk of votes which catapulted Erap into power. Relationship of the president with the Philippine Left, however, proved to be adversarial. Communists considered Erap as a stooge of the Americans and somehow linked him to the former dictator. Not surprisingly, the cultural elites never supported the president who they considered as an intellectually-challenged buffoon. Although Erap presented himself as pro-market at the start of his administration, the Makati Business Club aligned themselves against him due to his proclivity to pursue pro-poor, anti-business programs. As for his relationship with the Catholic Church, Archbishop Jaime Cardinal Sin openly condemned Erap's womanizing and gambling activities. Monsignor Pedro Quitoria of the influential Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) said in a statement that "If you cannot manage your personal life, how can you manage the life of a country?"

Chapter 9 presents the recent literature on the civil society organizations in the country (pp. 263-278). This is juxtaposed with Estrada's JEEP (Justice, Economy, Environment and Peace) Program headed by Aventajado. The initiative attracted former Left-wing personalities and intellectuals like Edicio dela Torre, Dodong Nemenzo, Karina Constantino-David, Renato Constantino Jr. and Leonor Briones. But the  Estrada-civil society affair was cut short due to several controversies (i.e. Coco Levy Fund). Most notable of all was the decision of some 3,000 member organizations belonging to CODE-NGO, the National Peace Conference, and the Women's Action Network for Development (WAND) to distance themselves from the administration, due to mass-scale corruption and failure of Malacanang to deliver basic social services to the poor.

A Must-Read for the Younger Generation
The volume's narratives are sincere, straightforward and compassionate. Although the Laquians highlight the disturbing character of the former president, they are also quick to provide a caveat--that Estrada is not bad to the core. He was just unable to control the external pressures which derailed his leadership. Nonetheless, the final accountability belongs to him. The authors write:

"There are many reasons for Erap's downfall. But the bottom line was that he just didn't have  the capabilities and discipline demanded by the Philippine presidency.  He could have the best minds in the country to assist him but he chose to listen to the wrong people instead." (pp. 128)

Several lessons can be derived from this political tragedy (pp. 312-316): 1) Flagrant immorality and lifestyle excesses are not acceptable to the Filipino people; 2) Popularity and celebrity status are not bases for good leadership; 3) Greater public awareness of graft and corruption is necessary to ensure accountability of public officials; 4) The politicized role of the military is a threat to democratic life and 5)The Philippines will continue to be mired in elite and traditional politics despite civil society efforts.

Erap was a WYSWYG (What You See is What You Get) president.  The "masa" loved him because of his natural transparency. On the contrary, he is one of the biggest disappointments in Philippine political life because he lived a double life, "rivaling, in the amount of lies unearthed, the excesses of the Marcos dictatorship" (pp. 115). Machiavelli could have advised Erap to voluntarily relinquish his position mainly because "fortuna" was not kind to him. Erap attempted to hold on to power. Up to now, he never admitted that he violated the trust of the people. History is summoned to show that the "masa" never committed a mistake electing him into office (because they trusted him) and likewise, never went wrong when they decided to get rid of him from office (because Erap failed them).

As an old adage declares, "Old people die. Young people forget." Filipinos are known to have high tolerance of public misconduct and corruption. May the painful lessons of the Estrada administration and EDSA 2 be not relegated to trash bin of Philippine history. The volume may be misconstrued as a "biased" work of a disgruntled academic. EDSA 2, however, vindicated the Laquian couple. The book forewarns the younger generation of  the long-term consequences of electing an incompetent president who is not only prone to lackadaisical performance but can also be swayed by personal loyalties and friendships.




[1] Vanzi, Sol Jose. 2000. Transcript of Remarks which cost Laquian his job. Available at  http://www.newsflash.org/2000/03/pe/pe001083.htm (accessed January 20, 2013)

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

PERA NG BAYAN, PANG-BONUS LANG?

Katulad ng kaniyang campaign slogan, "Gusto ko happy ka!", pinasaya ni Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile ang Kapaskuhan ng mga miyembro ng Senado sa pagbibigay ng tig-1.6M na pondo para sa opisina ng 8 senador at tig-P250,000 naman sa apat pa. Kung legalidad ang pag-uusapan, walang "unconscionable" o kagulat-gulat sa ginawa ng Senate President. Madalas na itong ginagawa ng maraming ahensiya ng pamahalaan na nagnanais na palakihin ang kanilang savings sa pagtatapos ng taon o fiscal year. Para kay Enrile, hindi ito suhol kundi dagdag na budget para sa Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (MOOE) ng kaniyang mga kasama. Pero, ang tanong, bakit kailangang ibigay ang  MOOE sa pagtatapos ng taon? Bakit hindi na lamang ibalik sa National Treasury ang pondo upang magamit sa ibang pangangailangan?

Sa isang bansang maraming naghihirap, hindi katanggap-tanggap ang ganitong uri ng paggamit ng pera ng pamahalaan. Ang Senado ay hindi pinaaandar ng pera ng isang pribadong kumpanya kundi ng buwis  ng sambayanan. Kung nagpiyesta ang mga staff ng Senado sa malalaking bonus, maraming empleyado naman ng Department of Agriculture, National Housing Authority at ilang government owned and controlled corporations (GOCCs) ang minabuting ibigay na lamang ang kanilang Christmas bonus sa mga biktima ng bagyong Pablo.

Samu't saring estratehiya ang ginagawa ng maraming ahensiya ng gobyerno upang lumaki ang kanilang pondo. Naririyang hindi pinupuno ang mga  vacant positions upang maging savings ang mga pondong inilaan ngunit hindi ginamit para sa mga nabakanteng posisyon. Maituturing itong "enforced savings". Ito ang kailangang busisiin ng Commission on Audit (COA) upang magamit nang wasto ang pera ng bayan.

Pinalutang din ng isyu kung paano nakasandig sa personalidad at pera ang pulitika ng bansa. Hindi prinsipyo at plataporma ang mahalaga kundi koneksyon sa makapangyarihan ang labanan.  Ginagamit ng mga pulitiko ang pondo ng pamahalaan upang isulong ang kanilang personal na agenda at interes.

Mahalaga ring malaman ng sambayanan ang mga "perks" o benepisyo na makukuha kung ikaw ay nasa puwesto. Dagdag sa P75,000 na suweldo kada buwan ng isang senador, may natatangap pa siya, taon-taon, na P200M Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) o pork barrel, P2.2M para sa suweldo ng kaniyang staff, P500,000 travel allowance at 30,000 hanggang 60,000 kada buwan na honorarium bilang chairperson o miyembro ng isang Senate Committee. Ang isang senador ay maaring maging chairperson o miyembro ng mahigit isang komite. Ang mga travel allowances ay ibinibigay sa kaniya, umalis man siya ng bansa o hindi. Hindi nakakapagtakang maraming nagnanais na makatuntong sa Senado.

Sa ganitong kalakaran ng pulitikang Pinoy mas tumitingkad ang babala ng Panginoon sa lahat ng nasa kapangyarihan. Hindi natin maaring paglingkuran nang sabay ang Diyos at ang kayamanan (Mateo 6:19,24). Ilang beses nang ipinakita ng kasaysayan na ang pagkagumon sa pagkamal ng kayamanan ang isang dahilan upang matanggal ang isang lider sa pamumuno. Lagi nating balikan at isabuhay ang diwa ng EDSA 1 at 2--na walang karapatang manatili sa puwesto ang mga lider na gahaman sa salapi at kapangyarihan.

Itinatadhana rin ng RA 6713 o batas sa etika ng paglilingkod sa bayan na kailangang mamuhay nang simple ang mga empleyado sa gobyerno. Sinasabi sa section 4(h) ng batas: "Public officials and employees and their families shall lead modest lives appropriate to their positions and income. They shall not indulge in extravagant or ostentatious display of wealth in any form." Nakikita ba natin ito sa ating mga Senador at Kongresista? Kinakatawan ba talaga nila ang sambayanan, lalo na ang mga nagdarahop at naghihirap, kung sila mismo ay hindi sanay sa simpleng pamumuhay?

Naging dukha ang Panginoon upang ipahayag sa lahat na hindi kayamanan ang magbibigay-kahulugan sa buhay (2 Corinto 8:9). Ang "pagmamahal" sa salapi ang isa sa ugat ng kasamaan sa lipunan (1 Timoteo 6:9-10). Ito ang maglalayo sa atin sa katuwiran at kabanalan ng Panginoon (Hebreo 13:5). 

Ito po si Ronald Molmisa para sa Opinyon ng Pilipino. Dahil sa isang bansang may demokrasya, opinyon ng bawat isa ay mahalaga.

Monday, December 10, 2012

NANG MATALO ANG PAMBANSANG KAMAO

Hindi sanay ang Pinoy na natatalo ang bida. Hindi bumebenta sa atin ang malulungkot na istorya. Marahil, masyado na tayong lugmok sa kahirapan kaya wala na tayong panahon upang malumbay pa. Gusto natin, ang ending laging masaya.

Binago ni Manny ang pagtingin ng bayan sa tunay na tagumpay. Bagaman nabigo siyang depensahan ang kaniyang titulo, hindi nabago ang pagtingin sa kaniya ng marami. Siya pa rin ang hinahangaang "Pambansang Kamao" ng bayan. Hindi nagawang magpalusot, mambuska o mangatwiran. Tinanggap nang buong saya ang pagkatalo. Nasaksihan natin ang isang atletang walang masamang buto sa katawan.

Madalas, naghahanap tayo ng paliwanag sa mga bagay na hindi natin maunawaan. Ibinubunton natin ang sisi sa mga bagay na labas sa ating karanasan. Pinipilit nating madiskubre ang dahilan upang gumaan-gaan ang ating kalooban. Anupaman ang kalabasan ng ating paguusisa, magtiwala tayo na batid ng Diyos ang ating patutunguhan. Minsan, hindi makakatulong ang patuloy na pagtatanong. Ang mga nagtatanong, madalas hindi naghahanap ng kasagutan kundi ng argumento at maidadahilan. Magtiwala na lamang.

Bakit natalo ang pambansang kamao? May simple at masalimuot na sagot. Ang pinakasimple--nagiba siya ng isang malakas na suntok ng kalaban. Period. Ganun ang boksing. Kapag naisahan ka, yari ka.

Ang mas kumplikadong paliwanag at maaring hindi matanggap ng marami- inaayos ng Diyos ang magandang plano para sa kaniyang anak. Ito marahil ang tamang pagkakataon upang pansamantala siyang tumigil upang marinig at maunawaan ang tinig ng kaniyang Panginoon.
Walang kulay ang buhay kung laging panalo. Ang lungkot ang nagbibigay-katuturan sa kasiyahan. Ang pagkatalo ang nagpapasarap sa tagumpay. Tama si Manny. Kahit ang mga higante sa lupa ay may angking kahinaan. Dahil pagdating sa langit, malalantad kung sino ang pinakamakapangyarihan. Hindi nasusukat ang tagumpay sa dami ng yaman at ningning ng pangalan. Ang pinakamahalaga ay nasa pangangalaga ka ng Manlilikha ng buong sanlibutan.

Thursday, December 06, 2012

RIGHT OF REPLY (ROR): Aprub o Pasaway?


Noong ika-27 ng Nobyembre, sa botong 17-3 na may isang abstention, naaprubahan sa committee level ang Freedom of Information (FOI) Bill. Pero hindi pa tapos ang boksing. Pagde-debatehan pa ito sa plenaryo at ihahain sa mga mambabatas para pagbotohan. May isang probisyon na hiniling ng Malacanang at ilang Kongresista ang hindi naisama sa ipinasang panukala--ang right of reply. Ayon kay Congressman Erin Tanada, isa sa mga masugid na tagapagsulong ng Bill, hindi naisama ang ROR sa pinag-usapan sa Technical Working Group (TWG) dahil inihain ito matapos na maibigay ang resulta ng pagpupulong. Ganunpaman, maari itong isama sa bill kung umabot ito sa second reading sa plenaryo.

Oobligahin ng right of reply ang mass media companies na maglaan ng espasyo (para sa print) o oras (para sa broadcast) para sa mga taong nais tumugon sa mga balitang nakaapekto sa kanilang reputasyon. Isa rin itong mekanismo upang maiwasan ang magastos na pagsasampa ng defamation at libel cases laban sa mga media personnel. Sa halip na paabutin sa korte, maaring ayusin na lamang ang kaso sa pamamagitan ng pagtatama sa mga maling impormasyon at paghahain ng balanseng pag-uulat ng mga balita. Sa kabilang banda, iniisip ng maraming media practitioners na tatamaan ang kanilang kalayaan at mga praktikal na gawain, lalo na kung tumangging magsalita ng mga taong apektado ng mga balitang kanilang inilalalabas. Mayroon din silang karapatang hindi magsalita.

Higit sa lahat, ikinakatakot ng maraming media firms ang walang patumanggang pakikialam ng gobyerno sa kanilang mga sinusulat at sinasabi. Mas maigi na maging isang "industry regulation" ito kaysa isang batas na magmumula sa pamahalaan. Kung maisasama sa FOI Bill, ang right of reply ay dapat lamang tumugon sa mga pagkakamali sa mga "facts" o datos ng pamamahayag at hindi ukol sa opinyon. Kung hindi, lalabagin nito ang karapatan sa malayang pamamahayag.

Ang right of reply ay isang mekanismo upang sugpuin ang abusado at may kinikilingang pamamahayag. Ito rin marahil ang dahilan kung bakit inaprubahan ng pangulo ang online libel clause sa Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012. Kung paanong pinapangarap ng FOI Bill na madaling makuha ng media ang mga pampublikong dokumento, marapat din silang maging responsable, tapat at patas sa pagtupad ng kanilang propesyon.

Ang kalayaan sa pamamahayag ay may limitasyon at hindi "absolute". Aminin natin na talamak ang envelopmental o kaya naman ay ATM journalism sa bansa, na siyang dahilan kung bakit maraming media personnel ang nagiging iresponsable at "corrupt". Marami ang nasusuhulan at nagiging "bata" ng mga pulitiko na may makasariling agenda. Kailangan ng mekanismo upang mabigyan proteksyon ang publiko laban sa mga taong ito.

Bakit matatakot ang media sa right of reply kung sila ay responsable sa pamamahayag? Lahat ng pumapasok na balita at impormasyon ay marapat lamang na masusing salain ng editorial team bago ilabas sa publiko. Dapat ding tingnan ng panukalang ito ang mga government-owned media firms na kalimitang nakatutok lamang sa mga positibong balita ukol sa gobyerno. Kailangang linawin din kung kailangang isama sa usapin ang mga bloggers na walang maayos na training sa etika ng pamamahayag bagaman itinuturing ang kanilang mga sarili na bahagi ng online media group.

Katulad ng tinanong ng Griyegong pilosopo na si Aristotle, "Sino ang magbabantay sa mga tagapagbantay? Ang mga miyembro ng media, na itinuturing na tagapagbantay ng nagaganap sa pamahalan at lipunan, ay kailangan ding matyagan. Wala silang karapatang magsalita laban sa korupsyon at katiwalian kung hindi sila mismo ay lumalabag sa batas ng katuwiran at katarungan.

Kung nagtitiwala tayong kayang bantayan ng mga mamamahayag---sa TV, print, radyo at Internet--ang kanilang sarili upang maging responsable at walang dungis, walang dapat ipangamba. Asahan natin na magiging sensitibo sila sa mga "feedback" na kanilang natatanggap mula sa publiko at susunod sa mga batas sa pamamahayag. Sa kabilang banda, makakabuti ring maglagay ng mga mekanismo upang maitama ang kanilang mga lihis na gawain.

Ito po si Ronald Molmisa para sa Opinyon ng Pilipino. Dahil sa isang bansang may demokrasya, opinyon ng bawat isa ay mahalaga.

Thursday, November 08, 2012

ANTI-POLITICAL DYNASTY BILL: Suntok sa Buwan?

Itinatadahana ng Article II, Section 26 ng 1987 Constitution: "Dapat seguruhin ng Estado ang pantay na pag-uukol ng mga pagkakataon para sa lingkurang pambayan, at ipagbawal ang mga dinastiyang politikal ayon sa maaaring ipagkahulugan ng batas." Nakakalungkot isipin na isa itong patay na probisyon dahil patuloy na naghihintay sa isang "implementing/enabling law." Ilang mambabatas na ang nagtangkang magsulong ng batas upang suportahan ito ngunit lahat ay nauwi sa basurahan at ibinaon sa limot. Sa kasalukuyan, inaamag sa Committee Level ang mga panukalang batas ni Senador Miriam Defensor-Santiago at Congressman Teddy Casino ng Bayan Muna Party List.

Tandaan na ang pulitikang Pinoy ay pinatatakbo ng mga makapangyarihan. Halos lahat ng bayan sa Luzon, Visayas at Mindanao ay kinakatawan ng isang mayaman at naghaharing pamilya--mula sa mga Abad ng Batanes hanggang sa mga Zubiri ng Bukidnon. Sa Senado, lalo na sa Mababang Kapulungan halos 70 porsyento ay miyembro ng political family (115 sa 15th Congress). Maaring demokrasya ang porma ng ating pamahalaan subalit ang sistema ng pamumuno ay oligarkiya.

May katotohanan naman na ang paniniwala na nananatili ang mga political dynasties dahil sa pagiging family-oriented ng mga Pinoy. Nasa dugo kasi natin ito. Sa isang banda, hindi lahat ng political dynasties ay tiwali at masama. Ngunit ibig bang sabihin ay magkikibit-balikat na lamang tayo sa pamamayagpag ng iilan at pang-aabuso sa kanilang kapangyarihan? Hindi lang kasi ito usapin kung "mabuti"o "corrupt" ang isang dinastiya kundi kung paano nila pinoprotektahan ang kanilang mga "mini-kingdoms" na isang paglabag sa Konstitusyon.

Una, maituturing na malaswa ang pag-monopolyo nila sa kapangyarihan sa pamahalaan. Magkakatabi silang nakaupo sa Kongreso maging sa executive branch ng gobyerno. Nakapako na ang kanilang pangalan at pagkatao sa mga opisina ng pamahalaan.

Pangalawa, hindi umuunlad ang maraming bayan dahil pare-parehong mukha at estilo sa pamumuno ang kanilang nasasaksihan. May isang bayan nga sa hilagang Luzon na hinawakan ng isang pamilya sa loob ng 50 taon subalit hindi kinakitaan ng pag-unlad. Nagdarahop pa rin ang maraming tao. Hindi tumataas ang kalidad sa pamumuno dahil walang bagong dugo at espiritu ng pamamahala. Same old banana.

Pangatlo, sa pagtagal sa puwesto ng mga political families, inaaangkin na nila ang posisyon na wari'y bahagi ng yamang kanilang minana sa mga namayapang magulang. Sa ganitong kalakaran, hindi lamang tayong maituturing na oligarkiya kundi isang monarkiya na pinagpasa-pasahan ang kapangyarihan sa iba't ibang salinlahi. At ang sambayan ang nagiging kahabag-habag na mga "subjects" na sunud-sunuran lamang sa dinidikta ng mga naghaharing pulitiko.

Pang-apat, ang mga programang makakatulong sa mahihirap tulad ng reporma sa lupa at mataas na sahod sa manggagawa ay hindi maisulong dahil sa impluwensiya ng mga dinastiyang pampulitika na hindi papayag na maapektuhan ang kanilang mga personal na interes.

Ano ngayon ang solusyon sa usaping ito? Suntok sa buwan ang bawat aksyon na isulong ang isang anti-dinasty bill hangga't ang mga miyembro ng Kongreso ay bahagi lahat ng naghaharing mga pamilya. Ganundin, kung pipigilan sila na tumakbo muli sa puwesto, lalabagin nito ang kanilang sibil na karapatan na makibahagi sa gawaing pampulitika. Wala ring malinaw na depinisyon ang terminong, "political dynasty". Hanggang saang degree of consanguinity ba dapat ipagbawal ang paghawak ng puwesto sa pamahalaan? Maaaring magbigay ng opinyon ang Korte Suprema sa usaping ito. Ngunit, bilang co-equal branch, hindi nito maaring puwersahin ang Kongreso na magpasa ng batas ukol sa isyu.
Sa huli, ang pagtatapos ng mga political dynasties ay nasa kamay pa rin ng sambayanan. Patuloy silang imulat sa negatibong epekto ng masamang pamumulitika at sakim na pamumunoi. Patindihin ang non-partisan "voter's education." Gawing matalino ang sambayan sa pagpili ng kanilang lider. Ganundin, resolbahin ang kahirapan na isang ugat ng sobra nilang pag-asa sa mga mayayamang pulitiko.

Wednesday, October 03, 2012

KORUPSYON: Pataas o Pababa?

Sa isang survey na isinagawa ng Social Weather Stations (SWS) mula July 16 hanggang September 14 ngayong taon, 71 porsyento (826 business executives) ang nagsabing mas bumaba ang korupsyon sa gobyerno kumpara sa mga nagdaang taon. Tumaas ang "sincerity rating" ng 16 na ahensiya ng pamahalaan sa pangunguna ng Office of the President na  may excellent mark (+81 mula  -37). Dumausdos naman ang sincerity rating ng mga city goverments (+35 to +24), Supreme Court (+40  to +23) at COMELEC (-8 to -14). Wala nang government agency ang binigyan ng "Very Bad" rating.  Katulad ng inaasahan, ang may "Bad" Rating pa rin ang Department of Customs  (-69 to -45).

Ang inilabas ng SWS ay ang pananaw ng mga businessmen pagdating sa katiwalian sa pamahalaan. Hindi ito ang kumpletong larawan. Kailangan din tingnan ang pulso ng sambayanan at silipin ang tunay na nagaganap sa lipunan. Pag-aralan din ang korupsyon na ginagawa ng maraming negosyante tulad ng hindi pagi-isyu ng resibo, pandaraya sa kanilang accounting books at hindi pagbabayad ng tamang buwis.

Paano ba natin tinitingnan ang korupsyon? Maraming Filipino ang nakatuon sa mga high profile cases (wholesale corruption) subalit nagbu-bulag-bulagan sa mga pang-araw-araw na manipestasyon nito (petty or street-level corruption). Galit na galit ang marami sa mga Kongresistang nagnanakaw ng kanilang pork barrel subalit OK lang ang panunuhol sa traffic enforcer. Kinukundena nila ang mga illegal na transaksyon sa mga ahensya ng gobyerno subalit nagpapadulas naman upang mapabilis ang takbo ng kanilang mga dokumento.

Nakakataba ng puso ang resulta ng survey dahil sa paglakas ng kumpiyansa ng  mga miyembro ng business sector sa gobyerno.  Subalit napakababa pa rin ng bilang ng mga nagre-report ng mga suhulan at katiwalian (9 percent) dahil sa pag-aakalang walang pupuntahan ang kanilang hinaing. Ito ang dahilan kung bakit dapat nang ipasa ang Freedom of Information (FOI) Bill upang mas lalong mapadali ang pagre-report ng mga corruption activities at mas mabigyan ng proteksyon ang mga mamamayan na mag-uulat ng katiwalian. Kung talagang "sincere" ang pamahalaang Aquino na sugpuin ang korupsyon, kailangang mas paigtingin ang mga institusyon, patatagin ang kultura ng pagbabantay, at magpasa ng mga batas na susupil sa mga maling gawain sa gobyerno.

Ipinagkikibit-balikat ng marami ang mga katiwalian dahil sa paniniwalang wala nang solusyon ang problema. Huwag tayong maniwala sa kasinungalingang ito. Ang kasalanan ang naghihiwalay sa atin sa Diyos (Roma 3:23). Kailangang manguna ang mga taga-sunod ni Cristo sa pagsasabuhay ng kabanalan ng Diyos. Higit sa lahat, simulan ang pagwaksi ng korupsyon sa loob ng iglesya. Walang karapatang magsabi ang mga taong simbahan na sugpuin ang korupsyon sa gobyerno kung sila mismo ay hindi mapagkakatiwalaan sa salapi ng iglesya. Ialay natin ang ating mga sarili bilang mga handog na buhay at nakakalugod sa Diyos (Romans 12:1-2).

Ang hamon ngayon ay kung paano ipagpapatuloy ang ganitong kalakaran. Tatlong taon na lamang sa puwesto ang presidente. Kung maluluklok ang isang lider na taliwas ang pagpapahalaga sa kanya, maaring mapunta sa wala ang lahat ng pinaghirapan ng kaniyang pamunuan. Dito pumapasok ang papel ng simbahan na aktibong makisangkot upang masugpo ang katiwalian sa iba't ibang bahagi ng buhay-Pinoy. Kailangang magbantay at patuloy na manalangin para sa kagalingan ng bayan.


Ito po si Ronald Molmisa para sa Opinyon ng Pilipino. Dahil sa isang bansang may demokrasya, opinyon ng bawat isa ay mahalaga.

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

COUP De Grace? (Morsi and the Egyptian Military)

On August 13, the Egyptian President dismissed the country’s top military officers, Defense Minister Field Marshall Mohammed Hussein Tantawi and Chief of staff Lieutenant General Sami Annan. Five other generals were sacked from office. Abdel-Fatah el-Sissi, a former head of military intelligence replaced Tantawi while General Sedky Sobhy, an Islamist, was appointed as the new chief of staff. The members of the upper echelons of the military are scheduled to be replaced by the younger members of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF). Morsi also annulled a controversial provision in the constitution giving vast powers to the generals. Two days after the dismissal of two top officers, they were given positions in the president’s advisory council.

The military presided over state affairs since the resignation of Hosni Mubarak in February 2011. Last July, the military dissolved the parliament by the virtue of a Supreme Court decision questioning the election process. The parliament has yet to be reconvened to draft the new constitution. At present, Morsi holds full executive powers and without the parliament, he also serves as the de-facto prime legislator. These developments illuminate the power struggle between the first civilian president of Egypt and a military which aims to limit his power.

Many speculated that Morsi’s move is just symptomatic of the hushed political squabble between the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and the military. There were rumors that the military has been planning a major coup this August, and Morsi just responded to avert the scheme. Junior officers welcomed the president’s move since they have been demoralized by the political entrenchment of their senior counterparts, who deprived them of decent salaries and quality military equipment. All presidents since the 1952 revolution were military officers. The institution has been discredited in the eyes of the Egyptians due to their privileged position in society. It owns at least 35 factories and companies (20 percent of Egypt’s industries) and many of its officers occupy the posh apartments of Alexandria and Nasser City. 

Morsi’s purge of the “old woods/brass” can be a mechanism to dismantle the dual power in the country and consolidate the government. This is a politically engineered strategy to significantly broaden his powers. The country is still waiting for the new constitution which explains his current political swagger. After praising the military in his speech, he admonished it to concentrate on its “holy mission of protecting the nation". What he meant by “protection” is subject to various readings. The president argued that the move was not directed at a certain group of people and that there is a current need move the country “towards a better future with a new generation and long-awaited new blood.” Rebuilding Egypt necessitates the introduction of young blood in the military. For sure, it sent a chilling effect to the entrenched political institution. The Egyptian military is the largest military in the Middle East and the 10th in the world thanks to massive US aid ($1.3 billion annually). 

Any attempt to undermine the positive role of Egyptian military could be a “political suicide” on the part of the president. Morsi has yet to recover from the political consequences of a violent standoff on the Sinai Peninsula between the military and militants where 16 soldiers were killed. Majority of the people still value the contribution of the institution in modernizing the country. The October 1973 victory of the military is one of the most celebrated events in the country’s history. Military officers gained the respect of the nation when they refused to fire on peaceful demonstrators during the revolution. Nonetheless, the army appears to concede to Morsi's purge, perhaps fearing the breakout of another civil war resulting from any act of defiance.

Morsi’s move can also be a subtle technique to introduce MB’s pan-Islamist project. Many fear the introduction of Sharia vision of society. General Sedky Sobhy  once wrote a paper lambasting US  policy in the Middle East when he studied in the National War College in Washington in 2005. There has been a crackdown on secular dissidents as Morsi calls for a more Islamic constitution in the country. Geopolitically, Israel is now on it toes for a possible Intifada in Egypt. The peace treaty with Israel (Camp David Treaty), which the generals have safeguarded for more than three decades could be destabilized by the Morsi regime. President Mohamed Morsi is scheduled to visit Iran on August 30 to attend the Non-Aligned Movement meetings. He also made an earlier pronouncement that Egypt and the Palestine are “one”.

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Mga Isyung Kailangang Harapin ng JBC

Ang Judicial and Bar Council o JBC ang itinalaga ng Saligang Batas upang pag-aralan ang mga aplikasyon ng mga nominees na nangangarap maging miyembro ng Korte Suprema. Ito ang magsusumite ng listahan sa Presidente na siyang pormal na magtatalaga ng mga hukom. Mahalaga ang papel ng JBC sa pagpili ng susunod na Chief Justice lalo na ngayong kailangang isalba ang nadungisang imahe ng hudikatura bunga ng Corona impeachment trial.  Pinalulutang ng kasalukuyang proseso ng pagpili ang mga legal at pulitikal na isyung kailangang harapin ng JBC sa mga susunod na panahon.

Isang malaking katanungan ang dapat na maging bilang ng kinatawan ng Kongreso sa JBC. Ayon sa Konstitusyon, mayroon itong apat na regular na miyembro, kabilang ang kinatawan ng Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP), isang law professor, isang retiradong miyembro ng Korte Suprema, at isang kinatawan mula sa pribadong sektor. Bahagi rin ng konseho ang mga ex-officio members (sa bisa ng kanilang opisina) na kinabibilangan ng Secretary of Justice at kinatawan mula sa Kongreso. Ang Chief Justice ang tatayo bilang ex-officio chairman.

Sa pagkakataong walang tatayong Chief Justice, ang pinaka-senior sa mga Associate Justices ang uupo sa JBC. Kamakailan lamang, pinagbigyan ng Korte Suprema na magkaroon ng magkahiwalay na kinatawan ang Senado at ang Mababang Kapulungan. Dahil dito, sa halip na pitong (7) miyembro, magkakaroon ng walong (8) miyembro ang JBC. Kung ganito ang magiging kalakaran, mas may bentahe na sa boto ang Kongreso kaysa sa kinatawan ng dalawang departamento—isa lamang para sa executive (ang Secretary of Justice) at isa rin para sa judiciary (ang Chief Justice).

Nasisilip rin ang “insider tradition” sa Mataas na Hukuman. Magmula nang ito ay matatag noong ika-11 ng Hunyo 1901, walang Chief Justice ang naluklok nang hindi kabilang sa mga senior members ng korte. Exception dito ang naganap noong panahon ng Hapon nang italaga si House Speaker Jose Yulo bilang Chief Justice ng Japanese Military Administration. Ganundin, wala pang naisama sa short-list ng nominasyon ng JBC sa mahigit 25 taon nitong kasaysayan (mula 1987) na “outsider”. Sa mga nominees, 6 ang insiders at 14 ang outsiders. Naging kultura na sa JBC na isama sa listahan ang mga senior Supreme Court justices. Ganunpaman, hndi nakakasiguro na kung “insider” ang maluluklok sa puwesto ay magiging maayos ang pamumuno ng Korte Suprema. Tandaan natin na isa lamang ang Chief Justice, and primus inter pares, sa 15 miyembro ng korte. Katulad ng ibang sangay ng pamahalaan, ang judiciary ay apektado rin ng iba’t ibang uri at antas ng pulitika.

Pinaka-matingkad sa lahat ng isyu ang papel ng Pangulo sa proseso ng pagpili ng susunod na Chief Justice. Sa kasalukuyang patakaran, sinasala lamang ng JBC ang mga aplikasyon at ang presidente ang magdedesisyon kung sino ang kaniyang hihirangin mula sa shortlist na ibibigay ng JBC. Maaaring magdagdag ng pangalan mula sa mga nominees ang presidente kung nais nitong palawigin ang listahan. Matapos pumili ang presidente, hindi na dadaaan sa kumpirmasyon ng Commission on Appointments ang hukom na mahihirang. Maraming umaalma sa kapangyarihan ng presidente na iluklok ang nais niyang ilagay sa puwesto. May opinion na mas mabuti ang  pagbabalik ng 1935 Constitution system sa pagpili ng mga miyembro ng Korte Suprema.

Binigyan ng kapangyarihan ng 1935 Constitution ang presidente upang  pumili ng Chief Justice ngunit kailangang may “consent” o pag-sang-ayon ng Commission on Appointments (Article VIII, section 5). Ang COA ay binubuo ng tig-12 kinatawan mula sa Senado at Mababang Kapulungan. Sa ganitong sistema, may kapangyarihan ang COA na tanggihan ang napili ng pangulo. Subalit binago ito dahil sa pananaw na nagiging ma-pulitika ang proseso ng pagpili. Nagbago ang lahat noong Martital Law nang sinimulan ng dating pangulong Marcos ang tradisyon ng pagpili ng miyembro ng Korte Suprema gamit ang kaniyang kapangyarihan.

Sa kabuuan, ang Chief Justice ang mukha ng hukuman at sistema ng hustisya ng bayan. Itinatadhana ng Konstitusyon na dapat taglay niya at ng ibang hukom sa Korte Suprema ang apat na katangian—competence o kahusayan, integrity o katapatan, probity o kabutihan at independence o kakayahang magdesisyon para sa sarili.

Kung nagawa ng JBC na isapubliko ang mga panayam sa mga nominees, marapat ding isapubliko ang pagboto ng mga miyembro nito. Habang nagmamatyag ang sambayanan sa kilos ng mga JBC members, JBC rin ang kanilang panawagan – JUST BE CAREFUL sa pagpili ng susunod na Chief Justice.

Mga Aral na Iniwan ni Habagat

Muli tayong minulto ng matinding pag-ulan katulad ng hagupit na dinala ni Ondoy noong 2009 at ng “The Great Flood of Manila” ng 1972. Damang-dama na natin ang epekto ng climate change. Asahan nating mayroon pang mga “Habagat” na maaring humampas sa bansa. Napakahalagang iayon na natin ang ating pamumuhay sa katotohanang ito. Kailangang maglatag ng “long-term solutions” upang mabawasan, kung hindi man tuluyang masawata, ang masamang epekto ng matinding pagbaha sa Metro Manila at karatig-probinsya.

Kumplikado ang usapin ng flood control. Hindi ito maaaring ibunton lamang sa iresponsableng pagtatapon ng basura na nagbabara ng ating mga drainage system. Kailangan ring ipakita ng pamahalaan ang “political will” upang isaayos ang mga programa ukol sa migration at urban planning. Ang mga lugar na dapat ay hindi tinitirhan ay namumutiktik ngayon sa mga informal settlers at squatters. Sa tuwing rumaragasa ang malakas na pag-ulan, sakit sa ulo ang paglilikas ng mga kababayan nating nakatira sa mga estero at tabing-ilog. Ang resulta: nalalagay sa panganib ang kanilang buhay at ang buhay ng mga rescuers.  Hindi sila magawang paalisin ng mga lokal na opisyal dahil sa usapin ng “human rights” at pulitika. Sila kasi ang pinagkukunan ng boto ng mga pulitiko tuwing eleksyon.

Kailangang iiwas ang mga tao sa paninirahan sa mga hazardous areas. Ngayon ang panahon upang paigtingin ng mga local government units ang paggamit sa mga “geohazard maps”  at datos ng Project NOAH na sinimulan ng Mines and Geosciences Bureau ng DENR at Department of Science and Technology (DOST). Buhusan ng sapat na pondo ang PAG-ASA upang mas mapabuti ang weather forecasting at madagdagan ang mga kailangang teknolohiya. Linisin ang mga drainage system.  Magtayo ng low-cost housing para sa mga urban poor. Maaaring bilyon-bilyon ang aabutin ng mga proyektong ito. Ngunit napakaliit niyon kung ikukumpara sa mga buhay na mawawala at ari-ariang sisirain ng mas matitinding kalamidad.

Maaring “kamay na bakal” ang kailangan upang matigil na ang illegal logging na kumakalbo sa kabundakan ng Sierra Madre at iba pang kagubatan. Political will ang susi upang masunod ang National Land Use Plan na nagiging isang “patay na dokumento” dahil sa laki ng real estate investments ng mga makapangyarihan sa lipunan. Ang pagi-issue ng Environmental Clearance Certificate (ECC) at building permits ay nagiging “gatasang baka” ng maraming ahensiya. Maraming contractors ang walang habas na nagtatayo ng subdivision sa mga delikadong lugar. Sariwa pa sa ala-ala ng marami ang trahedya ng Cherry Hills noong 1999 sa Antipolo kung saan mahigit 50 residente ang namatay dahil sa landslide.

Walang ginagalang na “political boundaries” ang kalamidad. Tinatawag ng pagkakataon ang lahat ng munisipilidad, bayan at lungsod na magkaisa. Mahalagang kilalanin din ang kontribusyon ng ibang sektor—ang scientific community, mga arkitekto, business sector at maging ng international community. Gawin nating inspirasyon ang karanasan at expertise ng ibang bansa tulad ng Belgium, Netherlands at Malaysia sa pagkontrol sa baha.

Hindi tayo magiging kaaki-akit sa mga foreign investors kung may pangamba silang babahain at mapupunta sa wala ang kanilang ipupundar sa bansa. Ngayon natin mas nauunawaan ang kasabihang “kung ano ang ating itinanim, iyon ang ating aanihin.” (Galacia 6:7). Kung hindi tayo matututo sa trahedya ni Ondoy at ni Habagat, asahan natin ang mas matinding trahedya sa mga susunod na panahon.

The Nature and Limits of Propaganda

Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s foremost polemicist, argued that propaganda must be simple enough to be appreciated by the common people. A propagandist is a “true artist” and “master of the popular soul.” They have the acumen vis-a-vis their audience’s ability to perceive information. Propaganda, however, should be perceived as amoral. It depends on the goal it seeks. This is a historical irony since Goebbels was the major lackey of Hitler in committing mass atrocities/genocide in Europe.

Russian socialist theorist Plekhanov made a distinction between agitation and propaganda. The former utilizes ideas and slogans to shape people’s opinions, for immediate purposes, while the latter aggressively espouses the principles of Marxism-Leninism with the view of transforming the infra-culture and superstructure of society. Also, Lenin, in his work, “What needs to be done” also distinguishes one from the other according to the quantity of ideas being advocated and the means by which they are projected to the masses:

"The propagandist, dealing with, say, the question of unemployment, must explain the capitalistic nature of crises, the cause of their inevitability in modern society, the necessity for the transformation of this society into a socialist society, etc. In a word, he must present “many ideas”, so many indeed, that they will be understood as an integral whole by a (comparatively) few persons. The agitator however, speaking on the same subject, will take as an illustration the death of an unemployed worker’s family from starvation, the growing impoverishment etc and utilising this fact, known to all, will direct his efforts to presenting a single idea to the “masses”. Consequently the propagandist operates chiefly by means of the printed word; the agitator by means of the spoken word. (underline mine)"

Juxtaposing this view with the advent of information and communication technologies,  Lenin can be indicted for limiting the perceived images agitators can get across and the information people can absorb through this method. Agitation, as Lenin defined it, requires bigger forces to achieve its purposes. This view can be undermined by the capability of social networking sites (SNS) to make information spread like wildfire.

Moreover, propaganda is not merely an “art of persuasion”. The Bolsheviks elicited support from peasants and workers, not only because they intended to “brainwash” them, but also due to their skill to magnify existing social issues and trends, giving them sharper and precise focus. 

Propaganda shapes collective attitudes by manipulating significant symbols. Cyphers and codes can be expressions of allegiance. This can be witnessed in Hitler’s swastika and Nazi gesture and Mao’s Red Book which sustained the cult of personality in China. The zealous Red Guards, composed mainly of students, persecuted those who gave low esteem to the state-published booklet. This continued during Zhou En-Lai’s Thought Reform campaign in 1950s which smothered the power of Western/capitalist principles through massive indoctrination, struggle sessions (public humiliation of “enemies of the state”), among others.

Propagandism, however, entails significant costs. Sustaining a campaign warrants infusion of resources for the constant stream of ideological information. This compelled Stalin in 1930s to build Russia’s largest propaganda aircraft, Tupolev ANT-20, which served as the “voice from the sky” of the Communist Party. It was used to drop printed leaflets and even became a radio station hub and film projector. Mao was effective in projecting ad nauseum propaganda by inculcating among the youth his personal vision of Chinese socialism. In the same manner, Marcos, during Martial Law, ordered the religious singing of Bagong Lipunan hymn to project a "compassionate government."

Russian propaganda, of course, also had its offensive dimension. Glavlit, USSR’s main censorship organization used to employ at least 50,000 “watchdog” staff to eliminate anti-state information and make sure that printed materials are compatible with the state’s ideological spin. In the same vein, Marcos, with his Bagong Lipunan campaign, encouraged developmental journalism and clandestinely imprisoned anti-regime journalists. I remember Ariel Ureta being punished for mocking Marcos’s slogan---“Sa ikauunlad ng bayan, bisikleta ang kailangan.” As a result, he was forced to make his rounds inside Camp Crame using his bicycle.

Propaganda, to be effective, must be planted on a fertile field for it to prosper and influence a community. It is essential that it is congruent with people’s desires and aspirations. Hitler’s persecution of the “non-Aryan” race struck a chord in the hearts of Germans who, during that period, also desired global supremacy and freedom from the clutches of major powers which punished their country post-World War I. The masses’ lack of education and discernment of issues make them susceptible to ideological appeals.  However, propaganda can only be effective as long as the propagandists deliver their pronouncements. Hollow promises can cause disillusionment among the people.

Friday, August 10, 2012

Seven Reasons Why To Be In Youth Ministry and Stay (via Youth Ministry Ideas)

1. Youth are the most spiritually responsive segment of society – The statistics are somewhere between 85 -90% of people that choose Christ as savior end up doing so by age 21. There is a stronger indication that most do between age 5 to 14. What this means is you have a vital role in the influence of young people towards accepting the gift of salvation! Make sure that you are giving the gospel in your talks because you never know which night is the night that a student will place their trust in Christ.

2. Adolescence is the time when most determinitive decisions are made – Let’s take a look at the 4 C’s:
  •  Companionship – teens are looking for and developing companionship. who their friends are is extremely important and weighs heavily on their decision making because of the influence.
  •  Courtship – They spend a LOT of time talking about relationships. Who’s going out with who. Did you hear? I can’t believe that they did that! Be careful not to tease about their relationships as this can really damage the influence you have.
  • Career – Believe it or not – students are thinking about what they want to do for a career. They are wondering and exploring and looking for a path that will lead them into a career some day. We have the opportunity to help them down that path.
  • Convictions – Here are some negative convictions: Materialism (we are what we have). Secularism – (functional atheism). Heedism – (pleasure principle). Humanism – (I am the center of the universe). These are what you students are battling with on a day to day basis in their school. We have a job as youth leaders to help battle the negative convictions and give them God convictions.

3. Human tendency is to overlook the contribution to youth – Only problem with this is that look at the Bible and how it is filled with youth: Jesus, Mary, Timothy, David, Joseph, Samuel, Daniel. These were not old people – these were young people! I Timothy 4:12 “Don’t let anyone look down on you because you are young, but set an example for the believers in speech, in conduct, in love, in faith and in purity.” Young people can be a tremendous example to the older ones in Church! You have a role developing them into young people that love God!

4. Young people have their entire life ahead of them to live for Jesus Christ – The sooner that they begin a relationship with Christ – the longer their life for God is. They can have more of  an influence over their friends and family. They can make a lasting difference for God’s kingdom and it starts now in their lives not later when they are older. You can have such an impact on them by leading them to Jesus Christ – whom they can start their new life and live it out!

5. Young people are desperately searching for a model for their life – Young people will always be looking up to someone be it famous, father, mother, coach, and YOU the youth leader. They are looking for someone that’s not perfect, but progressing and real. They can tell if you are being fake – so instead be yourself and the students that connect with you will be the students that God will help you with.

6. Youth represent the greatest reservoir potential – Youth have so much potential! Most any of the great movements started with young people and it’s young people that can bring a change and revival to our countries. We need to be doing everything we can to help build their potential and help them to be a strong follower of Christ.

7. Youth need a committed adult outside the home to help them grow up – The teenage years are about creating their own identity and what you normally will see is some separation from their mother and father. So with that – they need adults with Godly influence to help them as they are growing up. They need youth leaders to step in and walk beside them and to lead them to making decisions based on what God would want.

What are some of your reasons to be in youth ministry?

Thursday, July 19, 2012

Political Culture/Socialization

Political culture refers to “people’s psychological orientation, being the pattern of orientations to political objects such as parties, government, and constitution, expressed in beliefs, symbols and values”.[1] It builds upon the studies of political behavior which focuses on individuals rather than larger political units.[2] It wishes to look at participants in the political system as individuals who have the emotions, prejudices and predispositions.[3] Behavioralism has eight intellectual foundation stones:[4] 1) Regularities (assumes that there are “discoverable uniformities”); 2) Commitment to Verification - The ability to verify ones generalizations, testability by reference to relevant behavior; 3) Techniques – Be more self-conscious and critical about its methodology; 4) Quantification (Results to be expressed in numbers where possible); 5) Values – separating facts from values; 6) Systemization – Theory and research as closely intertwined; 7) Pure Science (theory and applied research combined ) and 8) Integration (interdisciplinary character).

Political socialization is the developmental process through which persons acquire political orientations and patterns of behaviour.[5]  It is the process of transmitting the central values of society’s political culture from one generation to another. Studying political socialization does “not only gives us insight into the pattern of political culture and subcultures in [a] society, but also locates for us in the socialization processes of the society the point where particular qualities and elements are being sustained or modified.”[6]

The pioneering work of Almond and Verba (Civil Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, 1963) reveals that democratic stability is characterized by a blend of activity and passivity on the part of citizens and a balance between obligation and performance on the part of state leaders. They identified three major types of political culture: 1) parochial (i.e. Mexico and Italy) “where citizens are only remotely aware of the presence of central government, and live their lives near enough regardless of the decisions taken by the state.”;2) subject (i.e. Germany) “where citizens are aware of central government, and are heavily subjected to its decisions with little scope for dissent” and 3) participant (i.e. UK and US) where “citizens are able to influence the government in various ways and they are affected by it.”  A similar study of O.D. Corpuz[7] reveals the historical and cultural foundations of Philippine politics. The author writes argues that Filipino political institutions are not merely “adulterated versions” of alien institutions. Irregularities in the system manifest because Filipinos have a superstructure of Western-inspired values sitting on top indigenous infra-structure.


[1] Heywood, A. 2007. Politics (3rd ed). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 207
[2] Robert A. Dahl, "The Behavioral Approach in Political Science:  Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Pro- test," American Political Science Review, 55 (December 1961): 763-772.
[3] David  Easton,. "The Current Meaning of  Behavioralism," in Charlesworth, ed.,   Contemporary Political Analysis, pp. 11-31.
[4] David  Easton,. "The Current Meaning of  Behavioralism," in Charlesworth, ed.,   Contemporary Political Analysis, pp. 16-17.
[5] Easton, David. 1968. The Theoretical Relevance of Political Socialization.  Canadian Journal of Political Science 1 (2):125-146.
[6] Almond, Gabriel A. 1960. “A Functional Approach to Comparative Politics,” in Gabriel A. Almond and James S. Coleman (eds.), The Politics of Developing Areas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.pp. 31.
[7] Onofre D. Corpuz, "The Cultural Foundations of Filipino Politics," Philippine   Journal   of  Public Administration, 4 (October 1960): 297-310.

On Political Elites


Elite refers to a minority of individuals who have the most of what (power, wealth, status, etc.) there is to have or who get the most of what there is to get in society.  They have the highest indices (of success) in their branch of activity and they directly or indirectly play some considerable part in government.  Normative elitism contends that elite rule is desirable and that political power should be vested in the hands of a wise or enlightened minority (Heywood 2007:84). The classical philosophers (i.e. Plato, Aristotle, and Machiavelli) attempted to answer the question: Who is fit to rule? The major assumption of political leadership is that not everybody can rule. Leadership is reserved for those who possess certain qualities which distinguish them from ordinary people.  

Classical elite studies claim to be empirical (although normative judgments intrude) and sees elite rule as an inevitable, and unchangeable fact of social existence (Heywood 2007:85). For Mosca (1939), there are only two types of people in society—the rulers and the ruled. The organizational nature of the elites makes them the most convenient rulers of the society. In the same manner, Pareto (1968) considered the elites are the appropriate rulers because they have the skills and expertise. Using the German Social Democrat Party as a case study, Robert Michels (1949) introduced the “iron law of oligarchy” to explain the elitist/oligarchical tendencies of all socio-political organizations. Direct/participatory democracy although noble is physically and technically impossible.   

Modern elitist perspectives developed as empirical analyses but are more critical and discriminating about the causes of elite rule. Mills’s The Power Elite (1956) contends that elite power is subject to historical variations. There are three major keys in understanding the group: 1) psychological/social similarity; 2) structural coincidences (relationship with social institutions); and 3) explicit coordination (strategies for unity). An empirical study by the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ), The Rulemakers (2004), reveals the aforementioned characteristics of elites. The work shows how Philippine legislators  cannot live up to their title as “representatives of the people” given their economic status and political prestige.

For Guttsman[1], one of the shortcomings of elite theories is that they consider the ruling political group as belonging to the top group of society There is a little systematic study of the changing political elites within the framework of a changing social structure.. Also, no one can generalize the attitudes of elites vis-à-vis democracy.[2] It means they can also provide and espouse democratic values/ethos (democratic elitism). Schumpeter’s “realistic” model of democracy[3] argues that political power shall always be exercised by the elites (inter-elite rivalry). This is supported by Anthony Down’s idea of “competitive elitism”[4] which explains the entrepreneurial tendencies of politicians due to the need to satisfy the demands of political market wherein the electorate behave as consumers.


[1] W.L.Guttsman,"Social Stratification and  Political Elite,”  British Journal of   Sociology, 11  (June 1960)137-150.
[2] Frank Bealey, “Democratic Elitism and the Autonomy of Elites,” International Political Science Review, Vol 17, No. 3 (July 1996), p. 319-331.
[3] Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Allen and Win.
[4] Downs, Anthony. 1990. An Economic Theory of  Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.