The Scientific Way of Counting Ralliers

Below are two articles published by the Philippine Daily Inquirer to inform the public about the politics of mass mobilization. Asahan na nating gagamitin ng mga presidentiables ang mga "crowd estimates" para kumbinsihin ang mga botante na malawak ang kanilang suporta and they "have the numbers". I once interviewed Dr. Tapang for my research. The academic is authoritative and and I fully subscribe to his findings and claims.

-----
Measuring the size of crowds
By Giovanni Tapang
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 01:21:00 06/21/2009

ANNOUNCEMENTS about the size of a crowd after a big mobilization or event are usually as varied as the organizations giving the estimate.

At the Ayala rally on June 10 against a House resolution seeking to convene a constituent assembly (Con-ass) to amend the Charter, we had estimates ranging from a low of 6,000 from the Philippine National Police to a high of 15,000 from organizers.

Politics of numbers

The politics of numbers of a mobilization is obvious, as one story lead last year in the Philippine Daily Inquirer clearly put it: “The crowd is the statement.”

Every time a sizeable mass action is conducted, whether on Mendiola, Ayala or Edsa, conflicting estimates are issued that either downplay or magnify the data. Is there some way to effectively quantify the size of the crowd in a mobilization?

The accepted method for estimating crowd size is to measure the area covered by the protest and the crowd density, and then count the number of those who attended at a certain time.

This estimation is most easily done with overhead shots and aerial surveys. This method was used way back in the late 1960s, when Herbert Jacobs, a professor at the University of California in Berkeley, counted the number of students that can fit within the grid lines of the plaza where students gathered to protest the Vietnam War.

Rule of thumb

He developed a rule of thumb that is still being used in crowd estimation today. A crowd where each one is at arm’s length would cover about one square meter per person.

In a tightly packed, high-density crowd, a person would fill about a quarter of a square meter of space. This means that in these tight situations, four individuals can still comfortably stand and occupy a square meter of space.

There are several other points to consider. Crowd density is usually not uniform, except in very crowded areas, and will taper off from the hub of activity. The time the estimate was made is also important, as crowds are dynamic systems.

Over a period, the crowd size can swell or ebb due to people coming in and out of the assembly area.

Making an estimate at only one point can lead to a different count if it is taken at the peak or near the end of the event.

Assigning marshals to monitor people coming in and out of the hanay (line) would keep a contingent relatively organized.

Militant groups such as those under Bayan have this honed to an art and thus their numbers stay relatively intact until the end of the program.

Ayala area

The Ayala area, where the broad anti-Con-ass mobilizations were held, can be divided into four major areas: Ayala going toward Herrera, the central area of the intersection, along Paseo de Roxas and Ayala toward Makati Avenue and Edsa.

In our estimates, sidewalks and establishments are not included even though there are people who would usually stand there during mobilizations.

The maximum that these areas can hold at 4 per square meter would be about 90,000 people.

If we extend the coverage to the whole stretch of Ayala from De la Rosa to Edsa, the whole of Paseo and Makati Avenue, this maximum can reach 300,000.

Organizers would have different objectives for the mobilizations they organize.

Some events would be a show of force measured in number, while some provide a venue for gathering different political forces.

Edsa Shrine

If crowd size is the target, areas like Edsa or other multiple staging areas would be good places to assemble instead of Ayala.

The central Edsa Shrine-Ortigas area would comfortably contain more than 70,000 and there would be room to expand in four different directions if the crowd increases as it did during Edsa II.

Mendiola

Other assembly points like Plaza Miranda in Manila can accommodate around 5,000 in its central area. The length of Quezon Boulevard from C.M. Recto to Quezon Bridge can hold up to 50,000, while some 35,000 people can fit from C.M. Recto to Mendiola.

Near the foot of Mendiola Bridge, where most rallies are stopped, 5,000 would already fill the area and the central intersection. This estimate excludes C.M. Recto and Legarda and the stretch of Mendiola behind the statue of Chino Roces.

Liwasang Bonifacio

España Boulevard from Welcome Rotunda to Lerma can contain a bit more than 100,000 people marching along both directions. If we take only those who will fit from A.H. Lacson to Lerma, the number is around 36,000.

Liwasang Bonifacio, from the National Press Club to Padre Burgos, including the central area, can sustain 46,000 or more if we count people standing under the shade of trees.

Rizal Park

The Katipunan monument’s central area near Manila City Hall would hold 30,000, while Quirino Grandstand and Rizal Park (Luneta) can hold about half a million people. The exposed area of the central quadrangle in front of the grandstand can hold up to 170,000 people.

These estimates exclude covered areas, sidewalks and structures. Due to this limitation, these numbers are in the lower limit of the maximum capacity even if we use a density of four individuals per square meter.

Composition

Yet, it is not all about numbers. At the recent Ayala mobilization, what was more interesting was the composition of the rally rather than the size of the crowd.

The groups of religious, businessmen, militants and the political opposition attending the rallies have broadened since a few years ago. Who protested is as important as how many came and participated.

(Giovanni Tapang, a Ph.D., is the chair of the scientists’ group Agham [Samahan ng Nagtataguyod ng Agham at Teknolohiya para sa Sambayanan]. He is an associate professor at the National Institute of Physics in UP Diliman. Calculations used in this article can be found at www.agham.org.)


------

How to count ralliers in Luneta
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 01:27:00 06/21/2009

CROWD estimates of political rallies are often contentious because rally organizers and police estimates vary greatly. As someone put it the estimates usually depended on the political bias of the one doing the counting.

A case in point was the number of people who attended the proclamation rally of presidential candidate Eddie Villanueva on Feb. 22, 2004 in Rizal Park (Luneta) in Manila. It was reported in a newspaper that 2.8 million attended the rally. Other newspapers reported a much lower figure of less than a million.

Gauging the size of crowds at rallies accurately is difficult because the people are usually in constant motion. Densities also vary with respect to the distance from the stage.

In “Chronology of a Revolution 1986,” author Angela Stuart Santiago presents a method of determining crowd density, which, she says, depends on the positions assumed by the people in the crowd.

She presents different positions that characterize a typical rally and the number of persons per square meter based on accepted architectural dimensions.

These positions include a person sitting or squatting and occupying 0.313 square meters; standing, with persons at the sides and directly in front at arm’s length and occupying 0.44 sq m; standing, with elbow room at the sides, front or back and occupying 0.640 sq m; and standing, shoulder to shoulder, no space between people and occupying 0.125.

Based on her estimates, the densest is eight persons per sq m when they are standing shoulder to shoulder, with no space between them. The least dense is 1.56 per sq m when people are standing with elbow room at the sides and at the front and at the back, and 2.27 per sq m when people are standing with others at the sides and directly in front at arm’s length. The average, considering the most dense and least dense positions, is 3.56 persons per sq m.

Getting the total crowd estimate would then entail getting the area and multiplying this with the estimated crowd density.

The entire Luneta Park, for example, from the sea wall to Taft Avenue is 528,832.5 sq m (52.89 hectares). The area, which includes the roads surrounding the park, can accommodate 4.2 million people. That is, if it is totally devoid of structures and if eight people are packed in one square meter, standing with no spaces between them.

But if the average of about three people occupying a square meter is used, a totally barren Rizal Park can accommodate about 1.6 million. But this is an overestimation as at least 8,000 sq m of the area is used for the huge Philippine map, lagoon, fountains, plant boxes, gardens, monuments and poles, canteens and other structures.

Aerial photos of the Villanueva rally showed that his supporters nearly filled up only the grandstand to the Roxas Boulevard area. This has a combined land area of 122,671 sq m. Based on the least dense estimate of 1.56 per sq m and most dense estimate of 8 persons per sq m, the crowd could be as low as 191,367 or as high as 981,368 but still way below the 2.8 million estimate of Villanueva’s supporters.

(This article appeared in the Inquirer on May 7, 2004.)

FIRST LOVE should Never Die

Revelations 2 explains the word of the Lord to the Church in Ephesus which deals with the lost of FIRST LOVE of Christians in the community--their love for God. It affected how they related with the brethren. The Ephesians were successful in getting rid of "false doctrines/prophets". Nonetheless, their quest for doctrinal led to inquisitorial and legalist spirit among the believers. Due to the decaying state of Christianity in the community, Jesus told the Ephesians, through Apostle John, to remember where they have fallen, to repent of their sins and to return to their old good works.

In the same manner, some "senior" Christians fall into a "state of rut" in their spiritual walk with God. This is often caused by religious rituals and practices which often provide artificial mechanisms to relate with God. Without relationship, our worship can become mechanical and ritualistic. Religious activities can change our image, but not our heart and character. God knows us to the core. We can never fake our worship.

We should always go back to the period when we first met Christ and His cross. The time when we first experienced the "sparks" and "intense romance" with our Lord. Intimacy is what God desires from His children.

Michael Jackson (40) and Farrah Fawcett (63) - You will be MISSED

Nagluluksa ang buong mundo ngayon sa pagpanawa ng "King of Pop" at dating "Charlie's Angel"

Death is no respecter of persons. We must always be prepare to meet our God (Amos 4:12)

News:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31552029/ns/entertainment-music/
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090625/ap_on_en_tv/us_obit_fawcett

Internet Sex Scandals and the Battle for Purity

Napapadaan ako sa Quiapo sa tuwing ako ay umuuwi ng bahay mula sa trabaho. Anecdote: Dahil sa kasalukuyang isyu tungkol sa isang starlet at isang batang doktor, isa lang ang tanong (note: pabulong) ng mga parokyano sa lahat ng bilihan ng DVD sa lugar, babae man o lalake: Mayroon na ba kayo ng scandal ni KH? Hindi naman makapagbenta nang lantaran ang mga pobreng tindero dahil halos isang dosenang pulis ang nakaposte ngayon sa kalye ng Arlegue. Matindi ang crackdown sa mga nagbebenta ng video scandal. Ang sabihing “pinagpipiyestahan” ng sambayanan ngayon ang KH scandal ay isang “understatement.” Ang katotohanan, nagkalat na sa Internet sites ang video. You can never put the genie back in the bottle again. Dahil sikat ang mga kasama sa video scandal, knee-jerk response ng lahat na hanapin ang video sa Youtube at mga web sites.

Hindi pa uso ang Internet, sandamukal nang sex videos ang nagsulputan. Dati sa Betamax at VHS pa lang. Sa kasalukuyan, lahat ng may email ay imposibleng hindi mabigyan ng mga unsolicited, spam mails na may mga pornographic contents. Nakalulungkot isipin na hindi lamang mga estudyante at kabataan ang madalas na “stars” sa mga iskandalosong pelikula, kung hindi sila na rin ang pasimuno sa pagpapakalat ng mga ito. Sa isang bansang konserbatibo, hindi katanggap-tanggap ang ganitong deviant behavior. Dahil napag-uusapan ang iba’t ibang scandals, this is my way of making sense of the issue.

Violation of people’s privacy and man’s sinful nature. Bahagi ng ating pagkatao ang personal nating mga sikreto o mga bagay na ayaw nating ipaalam sa iba for personal reasons. The Bible also values privacy. With regards to private property, pinagbabawalan tayong magnakaw at kumuha ng asawa ng iba (Exodus 20). Maging ang Diyos ay may sikreto na hindi na natin dapat ungkatin pa (Deuteronomio 29:29, Isaias 45:15). When we violate people’s privacy, we also destroy their dignity—dahil nagmumukha silang helpless. May nais silang itago sa maraming tao pero nadiskubre na at nabuksan na ang libro ng kanilang buhay. Man’s sinful and fallen nature enjoys intruding other’s privacy. Gusto nating nakikialam sa buhay ng iba because it gives us pleasure. Voyeurism is a self-centered activity.

Ika nga ng tiyuhin ni Spiderman, great power comes great responsibility. Naging malaking isyu ang kasalukuyang scandal dahil prominenteng mga tao ang involved. Pinapatunayan lamang nito na hindi ang “video scandal” per se ang naging sentro ng usapan, kung hindi ang mga sikat na taong naging bahagi ng istorya. Isang malaking hamon sa mga lider na panatilihin ang kanilang integridad. Kahit sabihin ng ilang mga artista na hindi nila kailanman nanaisin na maging mga “role models”, the fact na humaharap sila sa kamera, by default, sinusubaybayan ng publiko ang kanilang buhay. Hence, they have the moral obligation to live moral lives. That’s the cost they have to pay by being famous and powerful.

Use Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) for our benefit, not for our destruction. Maraming kabataan ang walang patumanggang pinagkukunan (cellphone, digicam) ang kanilang sarili—sa kalye, sa eskwelahan, sa poste, sa kanilang kuwarto, kahit sa loob ng CR. Ang iba walang paki- kung naka-underwear lang o halos wala nang saplot. Para sa kanila, kailangang i-celebrate ang kanilang kaseksihan at voluptuous na katawan. Tuwang-tuwa rin silang tawagan ang kanilang mga sarili CAM-WHORES at i-upload ang lahat ng kanilang “sexy pose” sa kanilang Friendster, Multiply at online websites. Tapos, magtataka sila kung bakit may nakakuha ng kanilang mga sexy photos samantalang naka-private ang setting ang kanilang album. They are simply clueless about the possibility of hacking and information-sharing in the Net. Ito ang dahilan kung bakit dumarami ang mga video scandals.

We must remember that the Internet is a jungle and an information black hole. Kapag nagpakawala ka rito ng impormasyon, hindi mo na uli iyon mabubura. For instance, kahit i-cancel mo na ang account mo sa Facebook, gagawin lang nilang inactive ang iyong account. Kapag magbago ka nang isip at gusto mong balikan ang iyong profile, mag-log-on ka lang uli sa dati mong username at password, activated na naman ang iyong account. Ganundin, napakadali nang sumikat sa Youtube. Kumuha ka ng digicam., i-edit mo sa movie-maker, lagyan ng effects, may instant digi-film ka nang puwedeng pagkaguluhan ng lahat ng tao sa buong mundo.

We need the power of God’s Spirit to overcome lust and temptation. Madaling sabihin na huwag tumingin sa mga pornographic materials. Kasi kahit ayaw mo, may bigla na lamang bubulaga sa harap mo. Dahil halos lahat na mabalingan ng iyong tingin ay may sexual content, mukhang imposibleng hindi marumihan ang iyong isip. Manood ka sa TV, making ka sa FM stations, magbasa ka ng magazines at mga tabloids---lahat may sex messages at ang iba ay lantaran at bahagi na ng mga jokes ng mga TV host at radio DJs. Halos lahat ng teenagers ay may Friendster, Multiply at Facebook accounts kung saan nabubuo minsan ang mga MU (malalaswang ugnayan).

Nasaksihan ni Pablo sa mga taga-Roma ang ganitong kalagayan kung kaya’t sumulat siya sa mga iglesya doon (12:1-2). Noong panahong iyon, talamak ang homosexual activities, at nasa peak ang sexual revolution sa Imperyo. Ang kaniyang sulat ay siya ring mensahe sa kasalukuyang henerasyon. Kailangang “baguhin natin ang takbo ng ating pag-iisip at linisin ang ating mga puso”. We must not conform to the standards of this dying world. Overcoming lust and temptation is a matter of decision and spiritual will. We must develop spiritual disciplines that can help us overcome lust and negative sexual thoughts.

Since we live in a sex-saturated world, our mind is the main battleground. Kung ano ang makakabihag ng ating isipan, iyon ang maaring bumihag sa ating katawan at puso. Simply put, a mind that is not controlled and subjected to the authority of God cannot overcome worldly sins and values. Pornography is always crouching at our door. Hence, we also need to make a "covenant with our eyes" (Job 31:1).

The GOSPEL According to PrisonBreak

Una kong napanood ang life adventures ng magkapatid na Michael Scoffield at Lincoln Burrows noong 2006 through a cable TV channel sa isang hotel sa Malaysia kung saan ako lumagi. I watched the first episode and I was really hooked sa istorya. Interesante para sa akin ang relasyon ng dalawang magkapatid--malalim at hindi madaling mabuwag. Since then, I religiously watched all episodes of all four seasons. Overall, Prison Break is a thriller with a heart.

Do not be deceived by the title. Honestly, I find it is misleading. The protagonists are not hardcore criminals and “fugitives” but only collateral sufferers. For instance, Lincoln an Michael were only victimized by the mistakes of their parents and they endured so many agonies in the process. To give you more ideas on the flow of the story, below are the summaries of season episodes.

SEASON 1: The first season’s suspenseful and fast-paced character attracted millions of viewers around the world. Nagpakulong (sa pamamagitan ng simpleng shoplifting) si Michael sa Fox River State Penitentiary upang tulungang makatakas ang kaniyang kapatid na si Lincoln. Nadiskubre niyang biktima ng isang sindikatong kinabibilangan mismo ng presidente ng Amerika ang kaniyang kapatid. Ang sindikato rin ang nagpapatay sa kanilang ama. He was falsely accused and was sentenced to die. Pina-tatoo niya sa buo niyang katawan ang mapa ng Fox River upang matandaan ang escape plan. Pinakilala rin si sa season si Brad Bellick, ang maton na prison guard ng Fox Penitentiary na nagpahirap sa buhay nila Michael. Dito rin nabuo ang love story ni Michael at Sarah Tancredi. Natapos ang season sa pagtakas ng Fox River Eight—si Michael, Lincoln, ang lovesick na si Fernando Sucre, ang child molester na si T-Bag, ang na-born-again ngunit muling nagbalik sa pagiging criminal na si John Abruzzi, ang responsableng ama na si Benjamin Miles, ang binatang naging biktima ni T-Bag na si David Apolskis at ang mentally deranged na si Charles Patoshik.

SEASON 2: Ito ang second-half ng the Great Escape. Pinalutang ng season ang istorya ng mga mahahalagang karakter. Natapos ang buhay ng tatlo sa Fox River Eight—Abruzzi, Apolskis at Patoshik. Natanggal sa trabaho si Bellick at isa-isang hinanap ang mga pugante kapalit ng reward money. Nagkita-kita naman ang mga karakter nang malaman nilang totoo ang sinabi ng isang prisoner na may ibinaon siyang kayamanan sa isang bahay. Unang lumabas si Agent Alexander Mahone na naatasan upang hulihin ang mga tumakas. Nagtatrabaho pala si Agent Mahone para sa The Company. Sa isang court case, pinawalang-sala si Sara at Lincoln. Silang dalawa ang nagplano upang makatakas si Michael. Natapos ang season sa isang kulungan sa Panama, ang Penitenciaría Federal de Sona, kung saan panibagong pahirap naman ang naranasan nina Michael, T-Bag, Bellick at Mahone.

SEASON 3: Sinundan nina Lincoln at Sara si Michael sa Panama. Nakipag-usap si Lincoln sa isang miyembro ng The Company, si Gretchen Morgan na kumidnap sa kaniyang anak na si LJ at Sara. Sinabi ni Gretchen na kailangang maitakas ni Michael si James Whistler. Nakakuha ng trabaho si Sucre sa kulungan upang tulungan si Whistler at Michael sa pagtakas. Nang magtangka si Lincoln na iligtas ang kaniyang anak at si Sara, binigyan siya ng warning ni Gretchen. Pinadalhan siya ng isang kahon na may pugot na ulo. Inakala niyang si Sara ang pinatay. Kinidnap din ang girlfriend ni Lincoln na si Sofia bilang garantiya na maibabalik si Whistler sa The Company. Natapos ang season sa pagtakas ni Michael at Mahone. Hinanap naman ni Lincoln si Gretchen upang maghiganti sa pagkamatay ni Sara.

SEASON 4a: Ipinaalam ng istorya na hindi ulo ni Sara ang nasa loob ng kahon. Nadiskubre din ni Michael na nakikipagtulungan si Whistler kay Agent Mahone upang pabagsakin ang The Company. Nasunog ang Sona at nakatakas si Sucre, Bellick at T-Bag. Nang marating ni Michael ang Chicago upang iligtas si Sara, ni-recruit naman siya ni Agent Don Self upang pabagsakin ang sindikato kapalit ng kaniyang kalayaan. Dinala ang mga Fox River escapees at si Bellick sa Chicago upang bumuo ng isang team. Kasama din si Sara at ang isang computer hacker, si Roland. Inatasan silang kunin ang SCYLA, ang little black book ng sindikato. Nang makuha ng grupo ang microchip, tinaraydor sila ni Agent Self na napag-alamang interesado rin dito upang pagkakitaan. Nakuha rin kay Agent Self ang Scyla sa isang engkwentro.

SEASON 4b: Pagkatapos ng isang season break, ipinakilala ang ina nina Michael at Lincoln, si Christina, na siyang may hawak ng Scyla. Ilalako ito ni Christina sa gobyerno ng India at China upang magpasimula ng panibagong sigalot sa dalawang bansa. Nagkaroon ng mas malaking problema si Michael nang mahuli ni General Krantz ng the Company si Sara at naging hostage rin ni Christina si Lincoln. Kailangang mamili si Michael kung sino ang kaniyang ililigtas. Sa mga huling episodes ng season, nasagip ni Michael si Sara at Lincoln nang ibigay niya kay General ang walang lamang lalagyan Scyla, samantalang isang bomba ang ibigay niya kay Christina. Tinulungan ang grupo ni Paul Kellerman, ang dating miyembro ng The Company, upang maisuko sa UN ang microchip. Lahat ay nakatakas at nabigyan ng exoneration agreement subalit hindi pinayagan ng grupo na makalabas ng kulungan si T-Bag. Ipinakita ang libingan ni Michael na namatay sa edad na 31 bunga ng isang malalang sakit sa utak.

Below are some of the wonderful messages of the series. We can relate Michael’s work to the redeeming work of Jesus. Michael is typical of Christ who sacrificed his life and personal comforts to save his brother from the hell of prison life.

God loves us so much. Malalim ang naging pagmamahal na ipinakita ni Michael sa kaniyang kapatid kahit hindi niya ito “biological” brother. Hindi niya iniwan si Lincoln mula sa Fox River Penitentiary hanngang sa Chicago kung saan nila nagapi ang the Company. That’s real LOVE in action.

Man is separated from God because of sin. The wages of sin is death. This is very true sa buhay ni T-Bag. Kahit lang beses siyang magtangkang magpakabait, siya pa rin ang lumalabas na “hooligan” sa grupo. Ilang beses siyang iniligtas sa kamatayan ng kaniyang mga kasamahan ngunit hindi pa rin siya nagbago sa kaniyang saliwang buhay. He even attempted to rape Sarah to give Michael pain. Sa bandang huli, kulungan pa rin ang kaniyang binagsakan.

Christ died on the cross, to save man from the consequences of his sins. I don’t want to force this observation but I think this deserves to be noticed. Namatay si Michael for a purpose. And that is, to save his brother and bring life to the hopeless characters of the series. When you love someone, you will do everything for him/her. There is no greater love than this---that a man will give his life for a friend/brother.

We must repent of our sins and follow God. Isa lang naman ang nais ng mga pugante sa kanilang buhay—ang maging malaya at makasama ang kanilang mga mahal sa buhay. That’s why in the end they cooperated with the government and the UN officials to get rid of Scyla. That’s an act of repentance. They wronged people and they rectified all the troubles they caused.

Evangelicalism and the Environmental Movement

This thinkpiece by John McArthur also reflects my position on the emergent Global Green Movement. I agree with the proposition that man, as a manager of earth, should take care of God's creation. But we should avoid the ideological/spiritual pitfall of worshipping nature.

----
I do think we have a responsibility to care for the environment—we ought to care for every resource God has provided for us. That’s illustrated in the Old Testament account where God put Israel in the Promised Land, a fertile land flowing with milk and honey. God provided them that productive land and commanded them to let the soil rest every seventh year.

You shall sow your land for six years and gather in its yield, but on the seventh year you shall let it rest and lie fallow, so that the needy of your people may eat; and whatever they leave the beast of the field may eat. You are to do the same with your vineyard and your olive grove (Exodus 23:10-11; cf. Leviticus 25:1-7).

God gave that command because He didn’t want them to exploit the land and extract all its life. Allowing the land to rest every seven years ensured that it rejuvenated itself and continued to provide in the future.

When the Lord gave the Israelites the Mosaic Law, He warned them if they apostatized, He would remove them from the land (Deuteronomy 28). Sadly, the children of Israel did just that and came under judgment—the Northern tribes fell to Assyria in 722 B.C., and Judah to Babylon in 605 B.C. In fact, God designated the Babylonian captivity as a seventy-year captivity to rest the land for all the Sabbath years that Israel violated (cf. Leviticus 26:33-35; 2 Chronicles 36:17–21).

So I believe we are charged to treat responsibly all the wonderful resources God has given us. But that, in fact, has very little to do with the environmental movement. The environmental movement is consumed with trying to preserve the planet forever. But we know that isn’t in God’s plan.

The earth we inhabit is not a permanent planet. It is, frankly, a disposable planet—it is going to have a very short life. It’s been around six thousand years or so—that’s all—and it may last a few thousand more. And then the Lord is going to destroy it.

I’ve told environmentalists that if they think humanity is wrecking the planet, wait until they see what Jesus does to it. Peter says God is going to literally turn it in on itself in an atomic implosion so that the whole universe goes out of existence (2 Peter 3:7-13).

This earth was never ever intended to be a permanent planet—it is not eternal. We do not have to worry about it being around tens of thousands, or millions, of years from now because God is going to create a new heaven and a new earth. Understanding those things is important to holding in balance our freedom to use, and responsibility to maintain, the earth.

Just a footnote. Though this earth is our temporary home, do take time to enjoy God’s beauty. Take care of your yard. Stop to smell the flowers. Enjoy the forests. God placed those rich resources on this planet for our comfort and His enjoyment. Let us be thankful to Him for that.

NAKIKITA ng Panginoon ang iyong mga LUHA...

“You have kept record of my days of wandering. You have stored my tears in your bottle and counted each of them.” (Psalm 56:8-CEV)

Marami nang pagkakataong lumuha ako nang todo sa Panginoon. Lumuha ako noong nagkasakit ang aking ama pagkatapos kong magtapos sa haiskul. Lumuha ako noong nagtapos ako sa kolehiyo dahil sa labis na pasasalamat. Lumuha ako noong namatay ang aking lola dahil siya ang naging dahilan kung bakit ako naging pastor ngayon. Lumuha ako habang kami ay kinakasal ng aking kabiyak na si Gigi. Lumuha ako at nagsumbong sa Panginoon nang ilang beses magtangka ang ibang tao na sirain ang aking pagkatao.
There are times we can’t feel the presence of God in our lives. Sa mga panahong iyon, madalas tayong lumuluha. Luha ng lungkot. Luha bunga ng depression. Luha ng saklolo. Luha ng kawalang-pag-asa.

God acknowledges our tears. Anuman ang dahilan ng iyong pagluha, batid iyon ng Panginoon. As David wrote, nasasaksihan iya kung gaanong karaming luha na ang ating nailabas dahil mayroon siyang “record” noon sa langit.

In 2 Kings 20:5-6, Hezekiah wept before God. In response, God extended his life.
Si Jeremias ang tinatawag na “weeping prophet” dahil siya ang tumatangis sa Panginoon upang maligtas ang bayan ng Israel sa lahat ng kapahamakan at sumpa.

In 1 Samuel 1:9-10 Hannah wept because she was childless. God saw her tears and answered her prayer. Umiyak din ang balo ni Nain dahil sa pagkamatay ng kaniyang anak. Nahipo ang puso ng Panginoon kung kaya’t binuhay muli ang kaniyang supling (Lucas 7:11-15).

Umiyak si Pedro nang magsisi siya sa kaniyang pagtatwa sa Panginoon (Mateo 26:75).
Lubos na nalugod ang Panginoon sa babaeng nagbuhos sa kaniyang paa ng mamahaling pabango at naglinis nito sa pamamagitan ng kaniyang mga luha (Lucas 7:36-48).

Marami pa akong luhang ilalabas sa paglipas ng panahon. Pero, OK lang. Dahil alam ko na sa bawat pag-iyak at dalamhati na aking nararamdaman, nakikita iyon ng Panginoon.

HAS GOD SEEN YOUR TEARS? Iiyak mo lang iyan. Nararamdaman ng Diyos ang damdamin mo. Be honest with Him. Nakikita niya ang laman ng iyong puso. He will never leave you nor forsake you.

LET GOD VINDICATE YOU...

Nakakalungkot isipin na may mga pagkakataong mas lumulutang ang kasinungalingan kaysa katotohanan. Mas pinaniniwalaan ng marami ang mandarayang kaisipan kaysa yakapin ang katuwiran. Nagdurusa ang ilan dahil sa maling akusasyon, tsismis at kuwentong barbero.

When we (feel we) are falsely accused, what should be our response?

Foremost, we must search our hearts. Maaring may nagawa o nasabi tayo na hindi natin nalalamang nakasakit sa iba kaya sandamukal na negatibong akusasyon ang ating natatanggap. Ask the Holy Spirit so that He can help in identifying our mistakes. Humingi ng tawad sa Panginoon kung talagang may pagkukulang. Thereafter, rectify the problem using God’s wisdom.

E, paano kung talagang naakusahan ka lamang at naging biktima ng maling tsismis?

That’s the time we should seek God's face for spiritual comfort and wisdom. Psalm 109 provides the answer on how to overcome the issue. Naranasan ni Haring David ang maging biktima ng maling paratang at akusasyon. He writes in Psalm 109:1-5 (GNB)

“I praise you, God; don't remain silent! Wicked people and liars have attacked me. They tell lies about me, and they say evil things about me, attacking me for no reason. They oppose me, even though I love them and have prayed for them. They pay me back evil for good and hatred for love."

Sa kabila ng mga paratang, ano ang ipinalangin ni Haring David? He relied on God for his vindication. In the last verses of Psalm 109 (v. 26-31), David declares, “Help me, O LORD my God; because of your constant love, save me! Make my enemies know that you are the one who saves me. They may curse me, but you will bless me. May my persecutors be defeated, and may I, your servant, be glad. May my enemies be covered with disgrace; may they wear their shame like a robe. I will give loud thanks to the LORD; I will praise him in the assembly of the people, because he defends the poor and saves them from those who condemn them to death."

If you are righteous before God, no one can put you to shame. Let God be your greatest defense lawyer. Hindi mo trabahong maging abogado para sa mga kasong ibinabato sa iyo. If God is with you, He would surely defend and vindicate you.

Parable of the Gossiper

In his remarkable work, "The Book of Jewish Values" Rabbi Joseph Telushkin relates a 19th century Jewish folktale about a man who went about town slandering his rabbi. One day, realizing that many of the things he had said were unfair, he went to the rabbi's home and begged for forgiveness. The rabbi told the man that he would forgive him on one condition: that he go home, take a feather pillow from his house, cut it up and scatter the feathers to the wind. After he had done so, he should then return to the rabbi's house.

Though puzzled by the rabbi's strange request, the man was happy to be let off with so easy a penance. He quickly cut up the pillow, scattered the feathers, and returned to the rabbi.

"Am I now forgiven?" he asked.

"Just one more thing," the rabbi said. "Go now and gather up all the feathers."

"But that's impossible. The wind has already scattered them."

"Precisely," the rabbi answered. "And though you truly wish to correct the evil you have done, it is as impossible to repair the damage done by your words, as it is to recover the feathers."